Anna S. (eliade) wrote,
Anna S.
eliade

live the cliche

rahirah's post about fanon got me thinking. I realized, whoa: I'm in a fandom subgenre *so* *small* that:
  1. It has no recurring nicknames or verbal tics that drive everyone mad
  2. It has no fanon
  3. It has so little writing *at* *all* that it doesn't have enough badfic to be its own *genre*
Think about the implications of this.

One, I can have Jack call Vaughn "whelp" and no one will think twice! ... Okay, bad example. But you know what I mean.

Two, I can *make* the fanon. In fact, I make it now! Sloane went to Oxford! Weiss loves pickles! Vaughn has a mild phobia about squirrels!

Three...number three is just good.

Plus, you know how there's that thing when you're writing in a fandom and suddenly someone comes out with a telepathy story. And it's not just a great telepathy story. That would be okay. It's the *first* telepathy story and it's so freaking brilliant that it will *remain* the *definitive* telepathy story for that fandom. Forever. And so you never write a telepathy story. Because your writerly ego quails, your hands shake with nerves and flop sweat, the very idea makes you want to hide under your desk.

Well, ha ha ha! I can write every single wonderful cliche--FIRST! Actually, this may give the impression that I don't want other writers to tackle the same story ideas, but you'd be wrong. I love challenges where everyone does a variation on the same idea, and you get *thirty* telepathy stories all at once. I love the idea that something I write could lodge a kink in someone's head and they have to write it too. Because then I get to read it. But of course, with the above, I'm just talking about my own idiosyncratic writerly ego-reaction.

ETA: This post has been edited.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 22 comments