Log in

No account? Create an account
22 December 2003 @ 06:31 pm
White House warns of massive terror threat  
I know this sort of thing is political gravy to Bush, but that doesn't necessarily invalidate it. My own terror alert is edging up a bit. I wish I could just work from home until, like, January 15. Downtown Seattle doesn't strike me as the safest place to be at this time. I also feel the sudden need to buy several gallon jugs of water.

None of this helps me in the event of a nuclear attack, though.

By Curt Anderson

Dec. 22, 2003 | WASHINGTON (AP) -- Travelers by air, land and sea faced heightened security Monday as the nation steeled itself against a possible grandiose terrorist attack that government officials say al-Qaida has signaled could be imminent. President Bush advised people to "go about their lives."

"Our government is doing everything we can to protect our country," Bush said. "American citizens need to go about their lives, but as they do so, they need to know that governments at all levels are working as hard as we possibly can to protect the American citizens."

A major factor in the decision to raise the nation's terror alert level from "elevated" to "high" was the holiday season, when more people are distracted and traveling and large numbers of people gather at events ranging from football bowl games to massive New Year's celebrations in New York, Las Vegas, Los Angeles and elsewhere.

Yet the latest decision to go from "yellow" to "orange" on the terror risk scale was also based on specific, corroborated intelligence that al-Qaida may soon attempt to pull off a coordinated attack in multiple places to cause mass casualties – an attack that might authorities said might eclipse that of Sept. 11, 2001.

"There are a number of credible sources that suggest the possibility of attacks around the holiday season and beyond," said White House spokesman Scott McClellan. Such attacks, he added, are expected by terrorists being monitored overseas to "rival or exceed the scope" of those on Sept. 11 that killed about 3,000 people.

Several U.S. intelligence and law enforcement officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said they had no specifics about a potential method, location or time of any attack. But they continued to point toward aviation as a prime possibility, noting that al-Qaida tends to return to what worked in the past.

"We know, tragically, they turned four airplanes into missiles," Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge told reporters after a meeting of Bush's Homeland Security Council, which recommended the change in terror threat level on Sunday.

Cargo planes and flights originating overseas were of special concern. Officials say steps have been taken to improve security in both areas, but some critics call for the screening of all packages on cargo planes to prevent smuggling of bombs.

The State Department advised all U.S. embassies of the change in terror alert level and had previously issued a worldwide caution about recent terror attacks in Saudi Arabia, Turkey and elsewhere. Spokesman Richard Boucher said threats in those places were not diminished by the increased risk of attack within the United States.

"We have been concerned and need to be concerned worldwide because of the nature of the group that we're dealing with," Boucher said. "Al-Qaida has worldwide capabilities."

The United Nations put its headquarters staff in New York on high alert as well. The U.N. was recently the target of a deadly terrorist bombing in Baghdad that killed a senior official.

The Bush administration coupled its message of extra vigilance with an appeal to Americans not to abandon plans to travel, even if airports presented more of a hassle because of increased vehicle and baggage searches, police with bomb-sniffing dogs and parking restrictions.

"If you got holiday plans, go. Don't change them," Ridge said. "We cannot be burdened by that threat or fear. We need to be alert to it."

People were urged to give themselves extra time to get through airport security. The Transportation Security Administration put a travel tips bulletin on its Web site (www.tsa.gov).

Another layer of protection was likely put in place over the past 24 hours that is not outwardly apparent, security experts said. Among the likely steps was an increase in the number of air marshals, particularly on flights arriving from overseas, and undercover surveillance around airports, said Brian Jenkins, research associate at the Mineta Transportation Institute at San Jose State University and a special adviser to the Rand Corp.

Federal officials would not discuss their planning at such a detailed level.

Most travelers appeared to take the restrictions in stride, several airport officials said.

"I'm always impressed with passengers' ability to respect security concerns. The mood is very supportive," said Fred Szabo, commissioner of Cleveland Hopkins International Airport.

Across the country, security was strengthened for key bridges, tunnels, seaports and landmarks, as well as nuclear and chemical facilities and other installations that might be vulnerable to attack. At the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, officials said heightened security would include increased patrols and police vehicles.

"You hate to see that, but that's part of our plan," said Ken Schaefer, superintendent of the arch.

Law enforcement officials have repeatedly also warned that al-Qaida might try to attack softer targets, such as malls or hotels, that have fewer security obstacles and which will be crowded this time of year.
Current Mood: orange
Lesley: Vulnerable Lilah by Jessparatti on December 22nd, 2003 07:04 pm (UTC)
I still reckon you're safer than me in Central London.
Janean or just "luvs"luvs_phoenix on December 22nd, 2003 07:12 pm (UTC)
My boys were suppose to fly to Chicago between Christmas and New Years but the ex reneged. Again.

For once I'm damn happy about it.

witlingwitling on December 22nd, 2003 09:03 pm (UTC)
Dude, I know it's old, but this horseshit makes me crazy. What is all this "no specifics about a potential method, location or time of any attack"? But be on alert, folks! Loose lips sink ships!

I mean, God. In a perfect world, in which I trusted the American government to have the best interests of its populace in mind, I would have sympathy for the extremely difficult task of protecting an enormous, sprawling, very porous nation from guerrilla attack. But in that world, we would not have this government, which has proven itself time and time again to act only in its own best interests, which is to say, the best interests of the two hundred people in power. The disingenuousness (disingenuity?) is appalling. It makes me sick and angry. And illiterate.

This comment brought to you by cabernet sauvignon and free-floating anxiety and dissatisfaction.
(Deleted comment)
(Anonymous) on December 22nd, 2003 10:59 pm (UTC)
Precisely. I am *far* more likely to get killed crossing the street to go to the gym (hows that for an argument against exercise?), than I am in some sort of terror attack.

In fact, given my sparkling personality, I am *far, far* more likely to be throttled to death by someone I know personally, than as a random statistic.

If Bush really wanted to protect us, he could, I dunno, stop pissing off every other country on the planet and turning us into targets of his ego?
V. Wishesviciouswishes on December 22nd, 2003 10:26 pm (UTC)
Don't be scared, because everything will work out in its own way. I know that sounds cheesy, but it's true. If we don't go out or don't live, then those inflicting the terror, both the terrorists themselves and the warnings from the administration, win.
rachelrachelmap on December 23rd, 2003 01:42 am (UTC)
I live in Seoul. I'm actually more apprehensive about my plans to go back to the States for the holidays than I am about the North Korean Army parked along the DMZ.
fanaddictfanaddict on December 23rd, 2003 06:08 am (UTC)
I'm in Manhattan. We're on orange alert on a daily basis, so this bumped us to red alert. This means more policemen carrying larger guns. Really brings the holiday spirit.

Bush is a schmuck and I'm not sure what good these public warnings actually do other than create a climate of fear - but there's a lot of fear here already because we know the odds are NYC is still a major target. Without the Trade Center towers, sometimes planes fly so low over the city. And people freeze and look up, waiting. So if by going publicly to an orange alert causes there is the tiniest bit more vigelence... Well, I don't want to lose any more towers.
Tuesday Has No Phones: glassesthebratqueen on December 23rd, 2003 07:53 am (UTC)
I'm not sure what good these public warnings actually do other than create a climate of fear

Work to up Bush's approval ratings and attempt to shut anyone up who dares to suggest that he's more concerned with being a dictator who's never questioned than he is with being a real president.

Oh, wait - sorry I meant they keep the world safe for democracy. My bad. ;)
fanaddictfanaddict on December 23rd, 2003 09:20 am (UTC)
I thought that was implied by the climate of fear part...? ;) That or the Bush is schmuck...

Oh, wait - sorry I meant they keep the world safe for democracy.
Only Bush-approved democracies though, others that might get in his way by disagreeing with his foreign policy need not apply.